Mauryan Empire, perhaps Ashoka the Great (273-232 BCE), Silver karshapana

Mauryan Empire, perhaps Ashoka the Great (273-232 BCE), Silver karshapana

Mauryan Empire, perhaps Ashoka the Great (273-232 BCE), Silver karshapana

Weight: 2.96 gm., Dim: 10 x 15 mm.

Three punches (three deities, peacock on hill, "steelyard" / Single punch (peacock on hill)

This is a silver karshapana of the Maurya dynasty. Unfortunately, we do not have a definitive way to attribute these coins to specific kings, but this coin may well have been an issue of Ashoka the Great. Most Mauryan coins continued the Magadha pattern of five punches: a sun, a 6-arm symbol, and three others. This coin, however, is a rare deviant from this general pattern. The sun and 6-arm symbol have been eliminated and there are only three punches, although one is a compound punch with three figures. (There are other, similar, coins with three separate figure punches very much like the three on this single punch.) The punches include a very interesting one of a peacock perched on a 5-arch hill, which in all probability was a Buddhist symbol. A smaller version of the same punch appears on the reverse.

Although the Mauryan coins followed the coins of Magadha in many respects: they remained on the same karshapana weight standard, had essentially the same technique of manufacture and continued the use of five official punches, they differed in one important respect: their flans were a lot smaller. The Magadha coin we saw earlier (coin 3) was 25 x 23 mm; this Mauryan coin is 10 x 15 mm (but thicker). The main theory used to explain this size change over time is that the mint authority wanted to reduce the amount of space available for potential banker's marks. Some late Magadha coins are absolutely covered with banker's marks, making it difficult to discern the original design of the coin. It appears that reducing the size of the flan, and adding a miniature official mark on the reverse (as on this coin), did work to reduce and even eliminate the use of banker's marks.

The Mauryan kingdom must have been very rich as very large hoards of Mauryan silver coins are still found in India. From the collector's point of view, this is a great series, as the coins are plentiful, there are hundreds of types, and they can be obtained quite inexpensively. The first Indian coin that I purchased in 1998 when I started my collection was a Mauryan karshapana I bought on eBay. I couldn't believe I had been able to buy a coin perhaps of the time of Ashoka for under $50 (and I now know that I overpaid!).

The Mauryan empire started to weaken soon after Ashoka's death and crumbled by the second century BCE when the Mauryan king was overthrown by his general, Pushyamitra Sunga, founder of the Sunga dynasty. The Sunga kingdom, however, was quite small and never attained anything like the magnificence of Ashoka's empire, one of the largest ever known in India.

Bactria, Seleucid, Seleucos I Silver tetradrachm

Bactria, Seleucid, Seleucos I Silver tetradrachm, c. 290 BCE

Bactria, Seleucid, Seleucos I Silver tetradrachm, c. 290 BCE.

Weight: 16.87 gm., Diam: 26 mm.

Laureate, bearded bust of Zeus right  Athena driving elephant quadriga

Greek legend: BAΣIΛEΩΣ aΣEΛEYKOY (of King Seleucos)

This coin is represents one of the first clearly "foreign" coins to be minted in India. Although the Achaemenids had ruled northwestern India for a while, they did not leave any numismatic legacy. However, after Alexander the Great's brief appearance on the Indian horizon, the Seleucid empire established a presence in the northwestern part of the country. Although a few Greek style coins were minted in Bactria prior to the Seleucid issues, this coin, of Seleucos I (312-280 BCE) is nevertheless one of the first Greco-Bactrian coins. With a laureate head of Zeus right on the obverse and Athena in an elephant quadriga on the reverse, the coin is representative of the highest quality classic Greek coins of the period. It introduces to Indian numismatics not only an entirely new design type, but also the use of legends to identify the issuer. Here we see on the reverse the Greek inscription: BAΣIΛEΩΣ ΣEΛEYKOY (of King Seleucos).

To Seleucos, the Indian provinces were a distant holding far from the center of his empire in Syria. These distant provinces faced a threat from a rising super-power in India: the Maurya dynasty. The dynasty was founded in 322 BCE by Chandragupta Maurya, who overthrew the Nanda rulers of the Magadha kingdom and then began a process of expansion that extended the empire all the way to what is now Pakistan. Facing conflict with this powerful rival, Seleucos chose to forge a peace. He conceded all the Seleucid lands south of the Hindu Kush mountains (in modern Afghanistan) to Chandragupta (known as Sandracottas in the Greek literature of the time) in exchange for 500 elephants. So the Mauryan empire now extended from Bengal in the east all the way to Afghanistan in the west.

The Mauryan empire reached the peak of its extent probably under the rule of Chandragupta's grandson Ashoka (273-232 BCE), who has been called the greatest king the world has ever known. Ashoka's claim to this distinction comes from an unlikely source: It stems not from the extent to which he expanded his empire through conquest, but rather on his renunciation of violence and war, his adoption of Buddhism, and his mission to spread the non-violent teachings of the Buddha throughout his empire. Ashoka carved the Buddha's teachings on rocks throughout India, or on iron pillars he erected for the purpose. He also sent Buddhist missions to other countries, notably to Lanka, China and Southeast Asia. There is little doubt that he was the person who did more than anyone else to spread Buddhism throughout Asia.

Second coin of india Oficca

Gandhara janapada, Silver satamana, c. 5th-4th century BCE

Gandhara janapada, Silver satamana, c. 5th-4th century BCE

Three "septa-radiate" punches/Blank

Weight: 11.46 gm., Dim: 43 x 22 mm.

This is Indian History Second Official Document Coins . The launched By Gandhara Janapada is 4 th To  5Th Century . The coin Weight Is 11.46 G.M

This is a silver satamana of approximately 11.5 gm. from the Gandhara janapada, also dating from some time late in the 5th or from the 4th century BCE. This type is called a "bent bar" to reflect its ingot-like shape, curved into a crescent by the force of the two punches applied to its ends. The punches are produced by the same die. Most coins have just two punches, one at each end, but I have seen a few rare ones, such as the illustrated coin, that have a third punch in the center of the bar. The punches are always of this "septa-radiate" symbol, six "petals" radiating from a central circle accompanied by a seventh "stem."

This coin type has been used by some writers, notably Joe Cribb of the British Museum, to serve as evidence that coinage was not invented independently in India, but rather was derived from Greek sources. There exist some very rare coins of Kyrene that feature a design, probably representing a silphium flower, that resembles the punches on the Gandharan bent bars. Further, it is known that the Achaemenids, who ruled the Gandharan region in the 5th - 4th century BCE, resettled some political “trouble-makers” from Kyrene somewhere in their Indian satrapy. It has therefore been suggested that these Greeks from Kyrene brought with them the idea of coin-making from which the Gandharan bent bar resulted. In this view, these bent bars would not be issues of the Gandhara janapada but rather of the Achaemenid satrapy of India.

Most Indian numismatists do not accept this view, and I personally feel that the Gandharan coins offer evidence precisely of the opposite conjecture, that coinage was invented independently in India. The reason is that they are completely unlike any coins that circulated in Persia, such as the running king type, obviously inspired by Greek coins. Nor do they resemble the Kyrene coins in shape or method of manufacture. For coins so radically different from the Greek or Persian style coinage to circulate in a satrapy of the Persian empire, it must have been the case that they already had a history of commercial use in the area. The Persians must have discovered, as did the Greeks after them, that Indian merchants did not take easily to new styles of coinage; they liked to stick with tried and true designs with which they were familiar.

indian first coin is 5th century launch by shakya japada

Shakya janapada, Silver 5-shana, c. 5th century BCE

                                                               

Shakya   janapada, Silver 5- shana, c. 5th century BCE

Pentagonal punch plus two banker's marks / Blank

Weight: 6.96 gm., Dim: 24 x 32 mm.

This is a indian first coin is 5th century launch by shakya japada , This is indian History fisrt offical Coin in Documant .

Around 500 BCE, India was divided up into many separate "countries." Buddhist sources identify 16 major janapadas, or tribal territories. Coinage commenced at around this time and two of the earliest janapadas to issue coins were Gandhara, in the north-west (now northern Pakistan), and Shakya, along the India-Nepal borderlands. This coin is an issue of the Shakya janapada. This janapada is of particular interest as it was the birthplace of the Shakya prince Siddhartha Gautama, who became the Buddha. It is quite likely that the Shakya coin comes from approximately the same time and place as the Buddha.

The Shakya coin is an example of a coin type that was invented in India and continued to be used for over 1500 years: the punch-marked coinage. The name reflects the technique of manufacture used. The coin blanks were prepared usually by cutting large sheets of silver, and were then "punched" by one or more small punches that modeled specific designs. We see in the Shakya coin all of these ingredients. The rectangular shape reflects the easy cutting of the coin blank from a larger sheet, the sharp edges betray their origin from the use of a chisel, and the central punch reflects the core design of the coin, here the so-called "pentagonal symbol." 

The violence of the punch is expressed in the protuberance seen on the otherwise blank reverse. Some coins are found with only the one central punch, while others are found with additional punches around the central one. Some of these may have been official punches, and some may have been so-called "banker's marks," punches applied by bankers or money-changers, presumably to record their having assayed the metal content of the coin and found it be of sufficient purity. On this coin, there are two additional punches. One is a simple punch of a pellet and circle, probably a banker's mark, while the other is a complex symbol with a central dot surrounded by six arrowheads arranged radially. This may well have been an official punch, for three reasons: first, it is more complex than the typical banker's marks, second, it appears with some frequency on the Shakya coins, and third, it seems to be a precursor to the so-called "six-arm" symbol that appeared on virtually all the coins of the Magadha-Maurya dynasty of the 4th through 2nd centuries BCE. We will see one such coin a little later .

Silver Tanka or Shahrukhi

Babur (Zahir ud-din Muhammad), Silver tanka or shahrukhi, (1526-1530)

Legend :- Babur Zahir ud Din             Muhammand

Weight: 4.62 gm.

 Diameter: 22-23 mm

Year : 1526 To 1530

Indian history of the 16th century is dominated by the arrival of the Mughals. The founder of the dynasty, Babur, was a descendent of Timur (Tamerlane) and Genghis Khan, and son of the ruler of Fergana in modern Uzbekistan. However, his father died when he was just 12 years old, and he was dispossessed of his inheritance by ambitious nobles who usurped the throne. For the next 30 years, Babur attempted to acquire a kingdom somewhere or other, attempting to take at various times (and temporarily succeeding sometimes) Fergana, Samarkand, Kabul, and so on. However, despite temporary successes, he was unable to hold a kingdom for any length of time. Eventually, he decided to invade India. The Sayyids, who were a Timurid dynasty, had lost the Delhi Sultanate to the Lodis, and so Babur used his Timurid ancestry as a justification for laying claim to the throne in Delhi. With help from the Safavid ruler in Persia, Babur was successful in defeating the Lodis at the first Battle of Panipat in 1526, thereby creating the Mughal empire based in Delhi.

Babur spent the next few years consolidating and expanding his position, which he had done by the time of his death in 1531. Coin 41 is an issue of Babur in the style of Timurid coins from Central Asia of that period. The coin does not name a mint, and may have been struck at Lahore. More coins of the early Mughals can be seen on this page. 

Silver Sasnu Coins

Sultans of Kashmir, Shams ud-din Shah, Silver Sasnu (1537-1538)

Silver Sasnu

Legend: Al sultan Al-a' Zam Shams Al-din shah 

Within central ornamental diamond: zarb Kashmir,

Weight :   6.16 gm, 

Dimensions : 16    x 16 mm.

We last mentioned Kashmir in our discussion of coin 23. In the 7th century, Kashmir was in the hands of the Hunnic Kidarites. Over the next six or seven centuries, the kingdom was ruled by a succession of Hindu dynasties. What is particularly remarkable about this entire period is that the coinage remained remarkably stable ... the same basic design (similar to coin 23) persisted throughout this period, with only the names of the kings or queens changing over time.

Hindu rule lasted until the middle of the 14th century. An adventurer from Swat named Shah Mirza came to Kashmir, became a minister in the royal court, and eventually usurped the throne in 1346, thereby establishing the Kashmir Sultanate. This dynasty lasted through the 15th and most of the 16th century, eventually falling, like Malwa and Gujarat, to the Mughal emperor Akbar's conquering armies.

Through this entire period, the Sultanate issued a stable coinage based on a weight standard different from all its neighbors and its past: the silver sasnu of approximately 6.2 gm. Coin 40 is an example, in particularly fine style, of this coinage.

27 Oct 1947 The ruler of Jammu and Kashmir declares the accession of the ..... later threw her and her two sons in the prison and declared himself Sultan Shamsuddin. ... succeeded in usurping the throne, adopting the title Shams al-Din Shah. ... Sasnu as silver square and Kaserah as copper round coins were introduced of .

Indian Coins History

Indian Coins History

This is a first coins in india  By Mahajanapadas 

The first coins in India were minted around the 6th century BC by the Mahajanapadas of the Indo-Gangetic Plain, and certainly before the invasion of Alexander the Great in the 4th century BC. The coins of this period were punch-marked coins called Puranas, Karshapanas or Pana  Cowry shells was first ... Which is said to be existed at least 5,000 years ago

Elephannt On Anciennt Satavahana Coin

An elephant is depicted on obverse of this ancient Karshapana of the Satavahana (Andhra) Empire. At its peak the empire controlled most of central and southern India.  The reverse depicts the Ujjain symbol, also known as the Satavahana symbol. The symbol comprises of four circles attached to the ends of the bars of a cross.  The coin was issued by the early Satakarni dynasty between about 30 AD and 107AD.  The Satavahana Empire ruled most of central and southern India and engaged in trade with the Roman Empire. The coin is struck in a copper and lead alloy called potin .

Hisam al-Din Hushang Shah (1405-35)

Sultans of Malwa, Nasir Shah, Silver tanka,

Weight : 4.45 gm, Diameter: 19 mm.

As it happens, I have no coin from the 15th century included here, but rather have four coins from the 16th century. Nevertheless, coins 39 and 40 are representative of 15th century coins as they exhibit the style and type of 15th century coins of the respective dynasties: coin 39 being a silver tanka of the Malwa Sultanate and coin 40 being a silver sasnu of the Kashmir Sultanate.

We had seen in our discussion of coins 36 and 37 that the slave dynasty had lost its grip on the Delhi Sultanate, which had passed into the hands of Ala-ud-din Khilji around the end of the 13th century. The Sultanate had expanded into western India (including Gujarat and Malwa) and even further south into the realm of the Yadavas of Devagiri, the Hoysalas of Dorasamudra and the Pandyas of Madura. Thus Ala-ud-din Khilji brought the Delhi Sultanate to its maximum extent. Besides being a great general, Ala-ud-din was also an able administrator. However, he failed to establish an orderly succession. Soon after his death in 1316, a succession struggle broke out and, by 1320, the Delhi Sultanate passed into the hands of the Tughluq dynasty.

The Tughluqs ruled Delhi for the remainder of the 14th century, locked in an on-going struggle to preserve their kingdom. It was a losing battle. Bengal broke away and the Bengal Sultanate became established as an independent kingdom (see coin 37 above). The southern provinces also broke away and the new Hindu kingdom of Vijayanagar was established in 1336, along with Muslim-ruled sultanates in Bijapur, Ahmadnagar and Golconda. The death blow occurred in 1398, with the invasion of Timur (Tamerlane), a Mongol, descendent of Genghis Khan, and the ruler of a large kingdom that encompassed modern Iran, Afghanistan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan. Timur advanced to Delhi, looting and pillaging along the